4.8 Review

A review of solar collectors and thermal energy storage in solar thermal applications

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 538-553

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.051

Keywords

Solar collectors; Thermal energy storage; Heat transfer enhancement; Metal foam; Solar power stations; PCM

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/F061439/1]
  2. National Basic Research Programme of China [2013CB228303]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51176110]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F061439/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/F061439/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermal applications are drawing increasing attention in the solar energy research field, due to their high performance in energy storage density and energy conversion efficiency. In these applications, solar collectors and thermal energy storage systems are the two core components. This paper focuses on the latest developments and advances in solar thermal applications, providing a review of solar collectors and thermal energy storage systems. Various types of solar collectors are reviewed and discussed, including both non-concentrating collectors (low temperature applications) and concentrating collectors (high temperature applications). These are studied in terms of optical optimisation, heat loss reduction, heat recuperation enhancement and different sun-tracking mechanisms. Various types of thermal energy storage systems are also reviewed and discussed, including sensible heat storage, latent heat storage, chemical storage and cascaded storage. They are studied in terms of design criteria, material selection and different heat transfer enhancement technologies. Last but not least, existing and future solar power stations are overviewed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available