4.8 Article

Aerodynamic design and economical evaluation of site specific small vertical axis wind turbines

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 765-775

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.047

Keywords

Wind energy; Vertical axis Wind turbines; H-rotor; Khorasan province; Blade element momentum theory; Double multiple stream tube

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing demand for renewable energy with a sustainable and low-energy design is the main topic in many countries. This could indeed influence in utilizing small wind turbines which incorporate innovative designs and new materials of construction which may provide an attractive prospect of future applications of power production in the urban environment. In particular, H-rotor type vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) are considered as one of the most attractive solutions due to simplicity and ease of manufacturing. Optimized site-specific designs proved reductions in cost of energy by increasing in annual energy yield and a reduction in manufacturing costs. The greatest benefits were reported at sites with low mean wind speed and low turbulence. The terrain studied here is a site in Fadashk area in the province of south Khorasan in north east of Iran. The aim of this work is to design and optimize the site specific H-rotor type VAWT using the blade element momentum theory (BEM) and a double multiple stream tube model. The results of these analyses were then combined and synthesized for a 1.5 kW H-rotor VAWT with NACA4415 airfoil sections. The economical feasibility of the designed VAWT is finally integrated in the design procedure to predict annual production of electricity. Based on current electricity costs that is 12 cent per kW h in Iran for renewable energies, our evaluation shows a profit of 6 cent per each kWh generated power by the designed VAWT. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available