4.4 Article

The comparative effects of telmisartan and ramipril on P-wave dispersion in hypertensive patients: A randomized clinical study

Journal

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 298-302

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960280609

Keywords

P-wave dispersion; telmisartan; ramipril; hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Prolongation of P-wave times and increase of P-wave dispersion (PWD) were shown to be independent predictors of atrial fibrillation (AF). Angiotensin II receptor blockers (AARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have beneficial effects on atrial conduction times. However, there are not enough data about the comparative effects of those drugs on PWD. Hypothesis: We aimed to compare the effects of telmisartan and ramipril on PWD after 6-month treatment in hypertensive patients. Methods: In all, 100 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 and Group 2 each consisted of 50 patients, taking daily doses of 80 mg telmisartan and 10 mg ramipril, respectively. Twelve-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECG) were recorded from all patients before and after 6-month drug therapy. The P-wave duration (P-dur) measurements were calculated from the 12-lead surface ECG. Results: When pretreatment PWD and P-maximum values were compared with post-treatment values, a statistically significant decrease was found in both groups after 6 months (Group 1 and 2; p < 0.001 for PWD and P-maximum). P-wave dispersion and P-maximum values after treatment in Group 1 were statistically significantly lower than those in Group 2 after the 6-month treatment period (p = 0.01 for PWD; p = 0.008 for P-maximum). Conclusions: Telmisartan has a much greater lowering effect on PWD and Pmaximum values than ramipril. This finding may be important in the prevention of AF in hypertensive patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available