4.7 Article

The spatial distribution of PAH depositions to peatlands of Eastern Canada

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 39, Issue 20, Pages 3725-3733

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.009

Keywords

wetlands; bogs; organic pollutants; atmospheric deposition; deposition history

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies that document historic and recent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) deposition rates over large regions are rare. To address this knowledge gap, peat cores of 15,ombrotrophic bogs along a transect across Eastern Canada were dated with (210)pb for the period of about 1850-2000, extracted using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and analysed for 14 PAH by GC-MS/MS. Additional parameters, such as sulphur contents, were also determined. In the more populated regions along the St. Lawrence River, deposition rates in individual bogs peaked At 300-1430 mu g m(-2) yr(-1) in the mid-20th century, whereas in the remote regions of northern Quebec, northern Ontario, and Nova Scotia deposition rates remained below 150 mu g m(-2) yr(-1). Total deposition rates were moderately but significantly correlated to sulphur deposition rates (R(2) = 0.54, P < 0.0001), suggesting coal combustion as an important source of PAH depositions. Phenanthrene, benzo[b + k]fluoranthene, fluoranthene and pyfene were the most abundant PAH. In the remote regions phenanthrene dominated (40-60% of total), Whereas along the St. Lawrence River benzo[b + k]fluoranthene were most abundant (25-40%) and indeno [1,2,3-c,d]pyrene and benzo[g,h,i]perylene occurred in larger quantities. This pattern only emerged in the 20th century, whereas before, deposition rates and composition were more uniform. The study documents that within Eastern Canada regions of particular PAH deposition patterns exist and suggests that both local and regional emission and transport, played a role in the formation of these patterns. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available