4.7 Article

Occurrence and development consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages 1635-1640

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.009

Keywords

blastocyst formation; blastocyst quality; cytoplasm; oocyte morphology; vacuolization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Since little is known about the actual incidence and fate of vacuoles at different stages of development this preliminary study was set up to accurately measure vacuoles and track them to day 5. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Women's General Hospital in Austria. Patient(s): A total of 223 consecutive IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles (206 patients). Intervention(s): Accurate measurement of vacuoles. Affected gametes and embryos were cultured individually and tracked until day 5. Main Outcome Measure(s): Size and number of vacuoles, fertilization rate, blastocyst formation rate, blastocyst quality. Result(S): There was a significant relationship between size of the vacuole (cut-off value 14 Am) and fertilization (P <.05). At zygote stage the incidence of vacuoles was higher (P <.01) in ICSI (11.6%) than in IVF (5.3%). Only 32.2% of affected ICSI-embryos reached blastocyst stage on day 5 compared with 53.0% of the normal ones (P <.001). In terms of blastocyst formation vacuolization on day 4 (P <.001) turned out to be the most severe one. At blastocyst stage inner cell mass was affected less frequently than the trophectoderm (P <.05). Conclusion(s): Three types of vacuoles could be identified: (1) those already present at oocyte collection, which develop during maturation (day 0); (2) those artificially created by ICSI (day 1); and (3) those accompanied with developmental arrest (day 4). The later that vacuoles arose, the more detrimental their effect on blastocyst formation. (c) 2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available