4.6 Article

Diversity of Neotropical migratory landbird species assemblages in forest fragments and man-made vegetation in Los Tuxtlas, Mexico

Journal

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 1719-1734

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-0696-x

Keywords

agricultural habitats; avian diversity; forest fragmentation; Los Tuxtlas; Mexico; neotropical migrant birds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the presence of Neotropical migratory landbirds in a 90-km(2) landscape in the region of Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Using the. fixed- radius count point procedure, migratory landbirds were surveyed in 21 forest fragments and in four replicates of shaded ( coffee, cacao and mixed) and unshaded ( citrus and allspice) plantations, live fences, non- arboreal crops ( corn and jalape (n) over tildeo chili pepper) and pastures. The surveys resulted in the count of 4732 birds representing 72 species. While forest fragments accounted for 65% of the total species count, 73% of the birds were counted in the arboreal man- made habitats. Pastures contributed to 10% of the species and to 1% of the individuals counted. Live fences were particularly rich in individuals, accounting for 28% of the birds counted. Rarefaction analysis showed that forest fragments were the sites richest in species, followed by shaded and unshaded plantations and by live fences. Pastures were the habitats poorest in species, followed by non- arboreal crops. Species richness of Neotropical migratory landbirds was associated to vertical and horizontal diversity of vegetation in the habitats investigated. Shaded and unshaded plantations as well as live fences were more similar to forest fragments in species assemblages than non- arboreal crops and pastures. We discuss the conservation value of arboreal agricultural habitat and of live fences in conjunction with forest fragments as temporary habitats for Neotropical migratory landbirds that stop over or winter in Los Tuxtlas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available