4.7 Article

A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial of combination therapy with methotrexate plus ciclosporin in patients with active psoriatic arthritis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 859-864

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.024463

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding ciclosporin A (CSA) to the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) demonstrating an incomplete response to methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy. Methods: In a 12 month, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial at five centres in three countries, 72 patients with active PsA with an incomplete response to MTX were randomised to receive either CSA ( n = 38) or placebo ( n = 34). Patients underwent full clinical and radiological assessment and, in addition, high resolution ultrasound (HRUS) was performed at one centre. An intention to treat ( last observation carried forward) analysis was employed. Results: Some significant improvements were noted at 12 months in both groups. However, in the active but not the placebo arm there were significant improvements in swollen joint count, mean (SD), from 11.7 ( 9.7) to 6.7 ( 6.5) ( p< 0.001) and C reactive protein, from 17.4 (14.5) to 12.7 (14.3) mg/l ( p< 0.05) as compared with baseline. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ( PASI) score improved in the active group ( 2 (2.3) to 0.8 (1.3)) as compared with placebo ( 2.2 (2.7) to 1.9 (2.8)), p< 0.001, and synovitis detected by HRUS ( 33 patients, 285 joints) was reduced by 33% in the active group compared with 6% in the placebo group ( p< 0.05). No improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire or pain scores was detected. Conclusions: Synovitis detected by HRUS was significantly reduced. Combining CSA and MTX treatment in patients with active PsA, and a partial response to MTX, significantly improves the signs of inflammation but not pain or quality of life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available