4.7 Article

Immediate and mid-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for chronic total occlusions

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 1056-1062

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi191

Keywords

stents; occlusion; angioplasty; revascularization; restenosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To evaluate the outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for the treatment of chronic total occlusion (CTO). Methods and results We identified 122 patients who underwent revascularization in CTO lesions with SES from April 2002 to April 2004 (SES group). A control group was composed of 259 consecutive patients with CTO lesions treated with bare metal stents (BMS) in the 24 months immediately before the introduction of SES (BMS group). At 6-month follow-up, the cumulative rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 16.4% in the SES group and 35.1% in the BMS group (P < 0.001). The incidence of restenosis was 9.2% in the SES group and 33.3% in the BMS group (P < 0.001). The need for revascularization in the SES group was significantly lower, both target lesion revascularization (7.4 vs. 26.3%, P < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (9.0 vs. 29.0%, P < 0.001). BMS implantation (HR: 2.97; 95% Cl: 1.80-4.89; P < 0.001), lesion length (> 20mm) (HR: 2.02; 95% Cl: 1.37-2.99; P=0.0004), and baseline reference vessel diameter (> 2.8 mm) (HR: 0.62; 95% Cl: 0.42-0.92; P = 0.02) were identified as predictors of MACE during 6-month follow-up. Conclusion Compared with BMS, SES implantation in CTO lesions appears to be effective in reducing the incidence of restenosis and the need for revascutarization at 6 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available