4.8 Review

Opportunities and challenges for biodiesel fuel

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 1020-1031

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.029

Keywords

Biodiesel; Energy security; Environment; Food; Land change; Policy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30940058]
  2. National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China [20100471383]
  3. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Post-doctoral Research Funds [1001035B]
  4. Natural science foundation for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province [09KJD4800001]
  5. Jiangsu key lab of mechanical clean energy and application foundation [QK09006]
  6. Jiangsu University research foundation for young Scholars [08JDG039]
  7. Yancheng agricultural science and technology development program [YK2009081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fossil fuel resources are decreasing daily. As a renewable energy, biodiesel has been receiving increasing attention because of the relevance it gains from the rising petroleum price and its environmental advantages. This review highlights some of the perspectives for the biodiesel industry to thrive as an alternative fuel, while discussing opportunities and challenges of biodiesel. This review is divided in three parts. First overview is given on developments of biodiesel in past and present, especially for the different feedstocks and the conversion technologies of biodiesel industry. More specifically, an overview is given on possible environmental and social impacts associated with biodiesel production, such as food security, land change and water source. Further emphasis is given on the need for government's incentives and public awareness for the use and benefits of biodiesel, while promoting policies that will not only endorse the industry, but also promote effective land management. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available