4.8 Article

Conversion of carbohydrates biomass into levulinate esters using heterogeneous catalysts

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 88, Issue 12, Pages 4590-4596

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.049

Keywords

Carbohydrates; Catalysis; Methyl levulinate; Heterogeneous catalyst; SO(4)(2-)/TiO(2)

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [U0733001]
  2. National Key R&D Research Program [2007BAD34B01]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2010CB732201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The catalytic performances of common solid acids (ZSM-5(25), ZSM-5(36), NaY, H-mordenite, Zr(3)(PO(4))(4), SO(4)(2-)/ZrO(2), SO(4)(2-)/TiO(2), and TiO(2)) for the conversion of carbohydrates such as glucose to methyl levulinate in near-critical methanol were investigated to develop an environmentally benign catalyst with high activity. Among these catalysts employed, sulfated metal oxides (especially SO(4)(2-)/TiO(2)) were found to be a type of potential catalysts for prospective utilization, which showed remarkably high selectivity and yield of methyl levulinate and had negligible undesired dimethyl ether formation from the dehydration of methanol. With SO(4)(2-)/TiO(2) as the catalyst, methyl levulinate in ca. 43, 33 and 59 mol% yields could be obtained from sucrose, glucose and fructose, respectively, at 473 K for 2 h reaction time with a catalyst loading of 2.5 wt.%. The heterogeneous catalyst (SO(4)(2-)/TiO(2)) was easily recovered by filtration and exhibited good catalytic activities after calcination in five cycles of reusing. The surface structure and acidity variations of the fresh and recycled SO(4)(2-)/TiO(2) catalysts after calcination were characterized by XRD and NH(3)-TPD techniques. The results indicate that the catalyst crystallization structure was preserved after multiple cycles, the acid amount and acid strength of the catalyst reduced gradually as the increasing of recycling times. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available