4.8 Article

Artificial neural-network based modeling of variable valve-timing in a spark-ignition engine

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 81, Issue 2, Pages 187-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.07.008

Keywords

artificial neural-network; spark-ignition engine; variable valve-timing; engine performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Variable valve-timing and lift are significant operating and design parameters affecting the performance and emissions in spark-ignition (SI) engines. Previous investigations have demonstrated that improvements in engine performance can be accomplished if the valve timing is variable. Traditionally, valve timing has been designed to optimize operation at high engine-speed and wide-open throttle conditions. Controlling valve timing can improve the torque and power curve of a given engine. Variable valve-timing can be used to reduce fuel consumption and increase engine performance. Intake valve-opening timing was changed from 10 crankshaft angle (CA) to 30 CA for both advance and retard with 10 CA intervals to the original opening timing. In this study, artificial neural-networks (ANNs) are used to determine the effects of intake valve timing on the engine performance and fuel economy. Experimental studies were completed to obtain training and test data. Intake valve-timing and engine speed have been used as the input layer; engine torque and fuel consumption have been used as the output layer. For the torque testing data, root mean squared-error (RMSE), fraction of variance (R) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPS) were found to be 0.9017%, 0.9920% and 7.2613%, respectively. Similarly, for the fuel consumption, RMSE, R-2 and MAPS were 0.2860%, 0.9299% and 7.5448%, respectively. With these results, we believe that the ANN can be used for the prediction of engine performance as an appropriate method for spark-ignition (SI) engines. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available