4.8 Article

Design of an airlift loop bioreactor and pilot scales studies with fluidic oscillator induced microbubbles for growth of a microalgae Dunaliella salina

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 88, Issue 10, Pages 3357-3369

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.013

Keywords

Nanobubbles; Microbubbles; Nonlinear wave dynamics; Microfluidics; Microalgae; Airlift loop bioreactor

Funding

  1. Technology Strategy Board [BR046G]
  2. Royal Society
  3. Carbon Trust
  4. Czech Academy of Science [AV0Z20760514]
  5. Graeme Fielden and Hannah Nolan of Suprafilt, Rochdale England
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E036252/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/E036252/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to test the feasibility of growing microalgae on steel plant exhaust gas, generated from the combustion of offgases from steel processing, which has a high CO2 content. Two field trials of batch algal biomass growth, mediated by microbubble transfer processes in an airlift loop bioreactor showed only steady growth of biomass with 100% survival rate. The gas analysis of CO2 uptake in the 22001 bioreactor showed a specific uptake rate of 0.1 g/L/h, an average 14% of the CO2 available in the exhaust gas with a 23% composition of CO2. This uptake led to a steady production of chlorophyll and total lipid constituency in the bioreactor, and an accelerating exponential growth rate of biomass, with a top doubling time of 1.8 days. The gas analysis also showed anti-correlation of CO2 uptake and O-2 production, which along with the apparent stripping of the O-2 to the equilibrium level by the microbubbles, strongly suggests that the bioreactor is not mass transfer limited, nor O-2 inhibited. Removing O-2 inhibition results in high growth rates and high density of biomass. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available