4.6 Article

Enoxaparin prevents progression of stages I and II osteonecrosis of the hip

Journal

CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue 435, Pages 164-170

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000157539.67567.03

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a prospective pilot study, we hypothesized that enoxaparin (60 mg/day for 12 weeks) would prevent progression of Stages I and II osteonecrosis of the hip associated with thrombophilia or hypofibrinolysis or both over >= 108 weeks of followup versus untreated historic controls, with different treatment responses in primary versus corticosteroid-associated secondary osteonecrosis. Patients with one or more thrombophilic-hypofibrinolytic disorder and Ficat Stages I or II osteonecrosis of at least one hip were included. A blinded committee interpreted anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs at entry in the study and every 36 weeks to >= 108 weeks. Maintenance of the disease at Stages I and II versus progression of the osteonecrosis to Stages III and IV requiring total hip replacement was the major end point. Sixteen patients had primary osteonecrosis (25 hips; 13 Stage I, 12 Stage II), and 12 had secondary osteonecrosis (15 hips; five Stage I, 10 Stage II). With no Enoxaparin-related complications, 19 of 20 hips (95%) with primary osteonecrosis were unchanged from Stages I and II osteonecrosis at >= 108 weeks; 12 of 15 hips (80%) with secondary osteonecrosis progressed to Stages III and IV osteonecrosis. In primary osteonecrosis at >= 108 weeks, survival of 95% hips, or 76% (19/25 hips, based on intent to treat), compared favorably with untreated historical controls (approximately 20% 2-year survival), comparable to 20% survival in secondary hip osteonecrosis. Enoxaparin may prevent progression of primary hip osteonecrosis, decreasing the incidence of total hip replacement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available