4.8 Article

Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems under varying scenarios and its implications to Korea's renewable energy plan

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages 2254-2260

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.063

Keywords

Economic evaluation; Energy policy; Learning effect; Renewable energy; South Korea

Funding

  1. Engineering Research Institute of Seoul National University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies economics of renewable energy systems with consideration of future prospects on costs and uncertain external conditions that may affect competitiveness in the power plant market. The concept of learning curve is adopted to compute estimates on the costs of installing and operating renewable energy systems in the future; fuel costs and carbon price are modeled as scenario-dependent variables to analyze their impact on total costs under different scenarios. The proposed approach allows evaluation and comparison of total costs necessary in implementing renewable energy plans under varying technological, and/or economical conditions that face uncertainty at present. Moreover, analyzing the evaluation results further with techniques like sensitivity analysis can identify factors central to reducing the total costs. As an illustrative case-study, the Korean government's renewable energy plan has been evaluated accordingly, under three different scenarios defined by International Energy Agency (IEA). The evaluation results indicate minor changes in total costs of achieving the plan among three scenarios, mainly due to counterbalancing between the price of fossil fuels and carbon price. Further analyses revealed factors central to lowering the total costs necessary in implementing the plan hybridization between renewable energy systems, reduction of biomass production costs via technological innovation, increasing learning rates by focusing on R&D and international cooperation. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available