4.0 Article

Supraglacial moraines in Scharffenbergbotnen, Heimefrontfjella, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica -: significance for reconstructing former blue ice areas

Journal

ANTARCTIC SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 225-236

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954102005002634

Keywords

glacial geomorphology; last glacial maximum; supraglacial debris

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ice surface of the glacier in the 7 km long valley Scharffenbergbotnen in Heimefrontfjella, Dronning Maud Land, is characterized by blue ice fields and is partly covered by supraglacial moraine complexes. The debris cover of the supraglacial moraines is generally less than 50 cm thick and rests on glacial ice, and most of the surface morphology of ridges and numerous sink holes reflects irregularities in the underlying ice. The debris consists of angular to sub-angular clasts of local bedrock. We interpret the moraines to have an entirely supraglacial history, where colluvium and pre-existing moraines were brought into Scharffenbergbotnen primarily from the south/south-west by an advancing glacier during the last ice maximum in the region. The debris cover of the supraglacial moraines extends up to 200-250 m above the present ice surface on surrounding slopes in Scharffenbergbotnen, and generally to less than 100 in above the present ice surface on slopes outside the valley. We interpret this as marking the ice surface elevation in the area during the last ice maximum (probably LGM). The deposition of supraglacial moraines in the valley at that time, and their survival in the area until the present day, indicate that a local ablation centre and probably blue ice fields were present in Scharffenbergbotnen at LGM, and has been a persistent feature since. In a wider context, we argue that supraglacial moraines constitute a hitherto unexploited resource when reconstructing the former extent of blue ice areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available