4.4 Article

Galectin-3 expression in functioning and silent ACTH-producing adenomas

Journal

ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 107-114

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/EP:16:2:107

Keywords

pituitary tumor; galectin-3; ACTH cell; RT-PCR

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA90249] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galectin-3 (Gal-3), a beta galactoside-binding protein, has been implicated in a variety of biological functions including cell growth, differentiation, tumor cell adhesion, angiogenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis. We recently reported that Gal-3 was expressed in a subset of normal pituitary cells and tumors including PRL, ACTH, and in folliculo-stellate (FS) cells and tumors [1,2] and that Gal-3 had an important regulatory role in pituitary cell proliferation [1]. We further investigated the expression of Gal-3 protein in ACTH- and PRL-producing tumors and the expression of various galectin mRNAs by RT-PCR in pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary. Most silent ACTH subtypes 1 and 2 adenomas were negative or only focally positive for Gal-3 expression compared to functioning ACTH tumors from patients with Cushing's disease and Nelson's syndrome. In the normal pituitary, Gal-3 was expressed in less than 1% of the basophil-invading cells (ACTH cells present in the posterior pituitary) and in a subset of the anterior lobe ACTH-positive cells. RT-PCR analyses showed that many members of the galectin family including galectins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 were expressed in normal pituitary and in functioning ACTH- and PRL-producing tumors. These results indicate that Gal-3 is associated with functioning ACTH and PRL tumors and is expressed infrequently in silent ACTH adenomas, suggesting that Gal-3 protein and/or gene is altered in non-functioning ACTH tumors. The use of ACTH and Gal-3 immunostaining should help in the diagnosis of silent ACTH adenomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available