4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Increase in epinephrine excretion is associated with cognitive decline in elderly men: MacArthur studies of successful aging

Journal

PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 453-460

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.11.004

Keywords

epinephrine changes; cognitive decline; peripheral catecholamines; gender difference; memory decline

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [1K12AG01004, AG-17265, AG-17056] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. High stress hormone levels are associated with increased risk of cognitive decline in elderly individuals. However, the effect of late-life changes in stress hormone levels on cognitive decline risk has not been examined. Our objective was to investigate whether increase over time in urinary epinephrine excretion in older adults was associated with subsequent cognitive decline. Methods. Measurements were made on 154 high-functioning men and women, 70-79 years of age, in 1988, 1991, and 1995. Twelve-hour overnight urinary excretion of epinephrine (normalized by creatinine excretion to adjust for body size) was recorded in 1988 and 1991. Cognitive functioning was assessed in 1991 and 1995 by summary scores based on standard tests of language, memory, abstraction, spatial recognition, and spatial construction. Results. Compared to individuals whose epinephrine excretion decreased between 1988 and 1991, the individuals whose epinephrine excretion increased over the same period had greater subsequent declines in summary cognitive scores between 1991 and 1995. After adjusting for baseline epinephrine, baseline cognitive function, and relevant covariates, and stratifying by gender, increases in urine epinephrine were positively associated with cognitive decline only in men. Conclusions. We conclude that increase in urinary excretion of epinephrine predicts subsequent cognitive decline in older men. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available