4.7 Article

Patterns and predictors of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder persistence into adulthood:: Results from the national comorbidity survey replication

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 57, Issue 11, Pages 1442-1451

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.001

Keywords

attention-cleficit/hyperactivity disorder; diagnosis and classification; epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite growing interest in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), little is known about predictors of persistence of childhood cases into adulthood. Methods: A retrospective assessment of childhood ADHD, childhood risk factors, and a screen for adult ADHD were included in a sample of 3197 18-44 year old respondents in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Blinded adult ADHD clinical reappraisal interviews were administered to a sub-sample of respondents. Multiple imputation (MI) was used to estimate adult persistence of childhood ADHD. Logistic regression was used to study retrospectively reported childhood predictors of persistence. Potential predictors included socio-demographics, childhood ADHD severity, childhood adversity, traumatic life experiences, and comorbid DSM-IV child-adolescent disorders (anxiety, mood, impulse-control, and substance disorders). Results: Blinded clinical interviews classified 36.3% of respondents with retrospectively assessed childhood ADHD as meeting DSM-IV criteria for current ADHD. Childhood ADHD severity and childhood treatment significantly predicted persistence. Controlling for severity and excluding treatment, none of the other variables significantly predicted persistence even though they were significantly associated with childhood ADHD. Conclusions: No modifiable risk factors were found for adult persistence of ADHD, Further research, ideally based on prospective general population samples, is needed to search for modifiable determinants of adult persistence of ADHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available