4.7 Article

EAE in beta-2 microglobulin-deficient mice: Axonal damage is not dependent on MHC-I restricted immune responses

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
Volume 19, Issue 1-2, Pages 218-228

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.12.017

Keywords

axonal damage; knockout mouse; macrophage; multiple sclerosis; T-cell; MOG-EAE

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is accumulating evidence that CD8-positive (CD8(+)) T-cells and MHC-I expression may also play a role in neurodegeneration associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the role of MHC-I and CD8(+) T-cells by studying experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in beta-2 microglobulin knockout mice induced by myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) peptide 3555 or whole rat myelin basic protein (rMBP). For both encephalitogens and even after reconstitution of the immune system with MHC-I-positive bone marrow and transfer of mature CD8(+) T-cells (iMHC-I+ CD8(+) beta 2m-/- mice), the disease course in beta m-/- mice was significantly more severe with a 10-fold increased mortality in the beta 2m-/- mice as compared to wild-type C57BL/6 mice. EAE in beta 2m-/- mice caused more severe demyelination after immunization with MOG than with rMBP and axonal damage was more marked with rMBP as well as MOG even in iMHC-I+ CD8(+) beta 2m-/- mice. Immunocytochemical analysis of spinal cord tissue revealed a significant increase in macrophage and microglia infiltration in 2m-/- and iMHC-I+ CD8' 2m-/- mice. The different pattern of T-cell infiltration was underscored by a 2.5-fold increase in CD4-positive (CD4(+)) T-cells in beta 2m-/- mice after induction of MOG 35-55 EAE. We conclude that lack of functional MHC-I molecules and CD8+ T-cells aggravates autoimmune tissue destruction in the CNS. Enhanced axonal damage speaks for pathways of tissue damage independent of CD8(+) T-cells and neuronal NIHC-I expression. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available