4.5 Article

Effects of multiple sclerosis on respiratory functions

Journal

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 426-432

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr782oa

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To measure respiratory functions of ambulatory patients with multiple sclerosis and compare the results with expected values from healthy general population data. Further, to study the correlation of respiratory function impairment with the multiple sclerosis-induced disability level. Subjects: Thirty-eight patients with definite diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from the multiple sclerosis outpatient clinic. Methods: The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores (mean 4.34+/-1.39) were evaluated to measure disability level. Respiratory functions tested in the laboratory included spirometric (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC), maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) mouth pressure measurements. Patients were clinically assessed using a pulmonary dysfunction index (PDI) and dyspnoea index; various breathing features were also recorded. Results: With respect to expected values from healthy general population, important decreases were found in mouth pressures with MIP (77% +/- 23%, p congruent to 0) and MEP (60%+/-13%, p congruent to 0) while spirometric measures were significantly but less affected (FVC 94% +/- 12%, p < 0.01, FEV1, 91% +/- 16%, p < 0.001). FEV1/FVC ratios were normal. Notable increases in PDI (5.58 +/- 0.68, P congruent to 0) and dyspnoea index (0.32 +/- 0.47, p congruent to 0) were observed. Significant relationships (p < 0.01) between respiratory function impairment and the multiple sclerosis disability level could be detected for FVC, MEP and PDI. Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis clearly impairs respiratory functions; maximal mouth pressures are more severely reduced. This impairment increases with multiple sclerosis-induced disability level but is found to be independent from duration of disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available