4.6 Article

Maintained normalization of cardiovascular dysfunction 5 years after parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages 632-638

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.02.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) has been associated with premature death in cardiovascular diseases. Short-term prospects for normalization of cardiovascular derangements have been described after parathyroidectomy. This study explores long-term effects of parathyroideclomy on cardiovascular functions in pHPT. Methods. Thirty consecutive patients with pHPT were reexamined 1 and 5 years after parathyroidectomy, together with 30 matched controls, with echocardiography and a bicycle exercise test. Results. Serum calcium was normal in all patients and control subjects at follow-up. The maximal blood pressure during the exercise was higher before parathyroidectomy (median 223 [range, 200-268] mm Hg vs 202 [165-277] mm Hg, P <.05) but not 5 years after (230 [155-270] mm Hg vs 219 [165-252] mm Hg. The ST-segment depression diminished from -1.4 (-8.3-0)to -0.8 (-3.3-0)mm 1 year after parathyroidectomy and further to -0.1 (-3.3-0.0) mm after 5 years but zoos unchanged in the control group. The number of ventricular extrasystolic beats at exercise testing in the pHPT group before parathyroidectomy was higher than in the control group (1 [0-340] vs 0 [0-31). The isovolemic relaxation time at rest was prolonged before parathyroidectomy (mean 100 +/- 17 ms [SD] vs 89 +/- 14 ms, P <.05). Conclusion. Parathyroidectomy can induce long-lasting improvement in regulation of blood pressure, left ventricular diastolic function, cardiac irritability (ventricular extrasystolic beats), and other signs of myocardial ischemia, with potential implications for the postoperative life expectancy of Patients with pHPT who have undergone parathyroidectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available