4.7 Article

Origin and geochemical evolution of the Nuevo Montecastelo kaolin deposit (Galicia, NW Spain)

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 91-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2010.06.006

Keywords

Kaolin; Trace elements; Stable isotopes; Variscan granitoids; Iberian massif

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [BTE2001-2415]
  2. Government of Andalusia through the Research Group Applied Mineralogy [RNM135]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides insight into large-scale kaolinization of Variscan granitoids in the Iberian massif, based on an integrated study combining mineralogical, geochemical (with emphasis on trace elements) and stable isotope data from the Nuevo Montecastelo kaolin deposit (NW Spain). Mineral composition of the kaolinized granite is dominated by well-ordered kaolinite with minor amounts of quartz, K-feldspar, mica (illite/muscovite), accessory phases (rutile, ilmenite, zircon and monazite), and gibbsite locally. The abundance and structural order of kaolinite decrease with depth. The isotope composition of the kaolin (delta O-18 values around +20.5%, and delta D values around -60 parts per thousand.) is consistent with a supergene origin. Kaolinite was formed by extensive hydrolysis of feldspars (preferentially plagioclase), in equilibrium with meteoric waters at about 21 degrees C. Differential mobilization of major and trace elements during kaolinization has been inferred by using a mass-balance approach. Significant amounts of Na, Ca and minor Mn, Sr, P and U were removed from incipiently leachable minerals (plagioclase and apatite). In advanced stages of weathering, K, Rb, Cs and Ba were released from partial dissolution of K-feldspar and mica. By contrast, Ti, Zr, Th, Hf and the REE were retained in the resistant trace minerals that appear residually concentrated in the fine fractions of the kaolins. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available