4.4 Article

Effect of selective antagonism of mu(1)-, mu(1/2)-, mu(3)-, and delta-opioid receptors on the locomotor-stimulating actions of ethanol

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages 289-295

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.007

Keywords

ethanol; locomotor activity; endogenous opioid system; Mu-opioid receptor subtypes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have demonstrated that administration of nonspecific opioid antagonists such as naltrexone or naloxone reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activity in mice. However, because of their broad pharmacological profile, it remains unclear through which opioid receptor this antagonism is achieved. Therefore, the present study was aimed at further investigating the role of the different opioid receptors in ethano/induced (2.5 g/kg) locomotion in mice. First, we compared the effect of naltrexone (0-2 mg/kg) on ethanol-induced locomotion with that of the selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist, naltrindole (0-10 mg/kg). Results of this first set of data revealed that naltrexone completely blocked this effect of ethanol at doses suggested to occupy only mu-opioid receptors, and naltrindole did not modify ethanol-induced locomotion. In a second set of experiments, we further investigated the involvement of mu-opioid receptors in ethanol-stimulated motor activity by assessing the implication of mu(l)-, mu(1/2)-, and mu(3)-opioid receptor subtypes. Results revealed that mu( 1/2)-, and to a lesser extent mu(3)-, but not mu(l)-opioid receptor subtypes are involved in the psychomotor actions of ethanol. Data are discussed together with previous results which have emphasized the critical dependence of ethanol-induced motor behaviors on opioid receptors, as well as, of the integrity of beta-endorphin synthesizing neurons front the hypothalamic Arcuate Nucleus. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available