4.7 Article

Increased cardiomyocyte differentiation from human embryonic stem cells in serum-free cultures

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 772-780

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0184

Keywords

cardiac; embryonic; stem cells; coculture; endoderm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can differentiate into cardiomyocytes, but the efficiency of this process is low. We routinely induce cardiomyocyte differentiation of the HES-2 cell line by coculture with a visceral endoderm-like cell line, END-2, in the presence of 20% fetal calf serum (FCS). In this study, we demonstrate a striking inverse relationship between cardiomyocyte differentiation and the concentration of FCS during HES-2-END-2 coculture. The number of beating areas in the cocultures was increased 24-fold in the absence of FCS compared with the presence of 20% FCS. An additional 40% increase in the number of beating areas was observed when ascorbic acid was added to serum-free cocultures. The increase in serum-free cocultures was accompanied by increased mRNA and protein expression of cardiac markers and of Isl1, a marker of cardiac progenitor cells. The number of beating areas increased up to 12 days after initiation of coculture of HES-2 with END-2 cells. However, the number of alpha-actinin-positive cardiomyocytes per beating area did not differ significantly between serum-free cocultures (503 +/- 179; mean standard error of the mean) and 20% FCS cocultures (312 +/- 227). The stimulating effect of serum-free coculture on cardiomyocyte differentiation was observed not only in HES-2 but also in the HES-3 and HES-4 cell lines. To produce sufficient cardiomyocytes for cell replacement therapy in the future, upscaling cardiomyocyte formation from hESCs is essential. The present data provide a step in this direction and represent an improved in vitro model, without interfering factors in serum, for testing other factors that might promote cardiomyocyte differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available