4.0 Article

Combat casualties in Afghanistan cared for by a single forward surgical team during the initial phases of Operation Enduring Freedom

Journal

MILITARY MEDICINE
Volume 170, Issue 6, Pages 462-468

Publisher

ASSN MILITARY SURG US
DOI: 10.7205/MILMED.170.6.462

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The 274th Forward Surgical Team (FST) was the first FST deployed to Bagram, Afghanistan, to provide surgical care for combat casualties during the initial phases of Operation Enduring Freedom. This is an analysis of the distribution, cause, and severity of wounds for combat casualties and the surgical procedures they required. Methods: A prospective database was maintained for combat casualties cared for by the 274th FST. The database included demographic data, vital status, mechanism of injury, distribution and severity of wounds, and surgical care provided. Results: The FST cared for 224 combat casualties, including 153 U.S. soldiers, 19 coalition soldiers, 32 Afghan militia forces soldiers, and 20 detainees. Fragments were the most common mechanism of injury (49%), and the extremity was the most common location of injury (58%), whereas gunshot wounds were the most common cause of death (57%). There were few significant head, chest, or abdominal wounds (13%). The FST treated 103 surgical cases (73 with combat wounds), including neurosurgical, thoracic, general, orthopedic, and vascular cases, with a total of 180 procedures. Conclusions: The distribution, cause, and severity of wounds were similar to those in the Persian Gulf War, despite the obvious differences between these conflicts. The use of modem technologies, such as compact, portable, ultrasound and digital X-ray systems, expanded the capabilities of the FST. Even low-intensity conflicts can produce significant numbers of combat casualties, and the FST must be manned, trained, equipped, and supplied to treat a wide variety of combat wounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available