4.7 Article

Separation of chromium(VI) using modified ultratiltration charged carbon membrane and its mathematical modeling

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 254, Issue 1-2, Pages 229-239

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.011

Keywords

carbon membranes; phenol-formaldehyde; Raman spectra; separation ofchromium (VI); space charge model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supported non-interpenetrating modified ultrafiltration carbon membrane has been prepared by gas phase nitration using NO, (mixture of NO and NO2) at 250 degrees C and subsequently aminated in the second step using hydrazine hydrate at 60 degrees C. Separation experiments on the chromic acid solution have been carried out using unmodified (giving 96% rejection), nitrated (giving 84% rejection) and aminated (giving 88% rejection) carbon membrane. The water flux of the modified membrane however, has been found to increase by two times compared to that for the unmodified membrane with only 12% loss in rejection. This work presents a transport mathematical model through cylindrical charged capillaries of the membrane based on two-dimensional space charge model consisting of Nernst-Planck equation for ion transport and non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation for the radial distribution of potential. The solutions of these non-linear equations are computationally intensive and the difficulty has been overcome by a series solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation for the charge distribution. The effective pore size and non-dimensional pore wall potential of the membranes have been determined using this model by fitting the experimental data of the separation. The effective pore radius of the unmodified, nitrated and aminated carbon membranes are found to be 2.0, 2.8 and 3.3 nm respectively, which are less than the average pore size value determined from the molecular weight cut-off experiment and indicates the partial blocking of the pores by chromate ions. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available