4.4 Article

Comparison of methods to estimate physical activity and energy expenditure in African American children

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 363-371

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-821011

Keywords

tritrac-R3D; step-counter; questionnaire; doubly labeled water

Categories

Funding

  1. NINR NIH HHS [NR 02939] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low levels of physical activity and high levels of obesity among children in the US is a public health concern. Accurate methods to estimate physical activity are needed to determine the efficacy of intervention programs and to explore relationships between daily physical activity and health status in children. The purpose of this study was to compare the simultaneous use of the Tritrac-R3D (R) accelerometer (Tritrac), Yamax SW-200 Digiwalker stepcounter (Digiwalker) and the Self Administered Physical Activity Checklist (SAPAC) to assess physical activity (PA) and energy expenditure (EE) in African-American children aged 7 to 10 years, using the doubly-labeled water (DLW) as the criterion method. Physical activity and energy expenditure were measured over seven consecutive days under free-living conditions. Resting metabolic rate and peak VO2 were measured before the experimental period. There was no difference in physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) measured by Tritrac or DLW (p > 0.05). Tritrac activity counts were highly correlated with DLW-PAEE (r = 0.81). High correlations between Digiwalker and DLW were observed when body weight was considered. A low correlation (r = 0.49) was observed between the physical activity energy expenditure by SAPAC and DLW. In conclusion, with some limitations the Tritrac and Digiwalker can provide useful and accurate information about PA and EE in 7- to 10-year-old children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available