4.7 Review

Crusted scabies: clinical and immunological findings in seventy-eight patients and a review of the literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages 375-381

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.08.033

Keywords

scabies; crusted scabies; infection; immunological factors; mortality; T-cell subsets; indigenous; Australia; leprosy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To describe the clinical and immunological features of crusted scabies in a prospectively ascertained cohort of 78 patients. Methods. All patients requiring inpatient treatment for crusted scabies in the 'top end' of the northern territory of Australia over a 10 year period were prospectively identified. Demographics, risk factors, and immunological parameters were retrospectivety compiled from their medical records and pathology databases. Results. More than half the patients with crusted scabies had identifiable immunosuppressive risk factors. Eosinophilia and elevated IgE levels occurred in 58% and 96% of patients, respectively, with median IgE levels 17 times the upper limit of normal. Seventeen percent had a history of leprosy but 42% had no identifiable risk factors. There was a decrease in mortality after the introduction of a treatment protocol consisting of multiple doses of ivermectin combined with topical scabicides and keratolytic therapy. Conclusions. Crusted scabies often occurs in patients with identifiable immunosuppressive risk factors. In patients without such risk factors, it is possible that the crusted response to infection results from a tendency to preferentially mount a Th2 response. The treatment regime described was associated with a reduction in mortality. This is the largest reported case series of crusted scabies. (c) 2004 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available