4.2 Article

Circadian activity rhythms in selectively bred ethanol-preferring and nonpreferring rats

Journal

ALCOHOL
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 69-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2005.07.001

Keywords

ethanol; preference; rat; circadian activity rhythm; sleep

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R21 AA013893] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic alcohol intake is associated with dramatic disruptions in sleep and other circadian biological rhythms in both humans and experimental animals. In human alcoholics, these disruptions persist during extended abstinence and appear to promote relapse to drinking. Whereas chronic ethanol intake alters fundamental properties of the circadian pacemaker in unselected rats, nothing is known concerning circadian pacemaker function in selectively bred ethanol-preferring and nonpreferring rats, which are the most widely accepted animal models of genetic predisposition to alcoholism. The present experiments were designed to characterize free-running circadian activity (wheel-running) rhythms under both constant darkness and constant light in selectively bred ethanol-preferring (P, HAD2) and nonpreferring (NP, LAD2) rats. Differences in circadian organization between ethanol-preferring and nonpreferring animals were seen for both pairs of selected lines (P vs. NP; HAD2 vs. LAD2), but these differences were not identical in the two line pairs. For example, although P rats showed shorter free-running periods than NP rats only in constant light, HAD2 rats showed shorter free-running periods than LAD2 rats only in constant darkness. In addition, ethanol-preferring HAD2 rats showed a high rate of rhythm splitting that was not seen in any of the other three lines. Taken together, these results suggest that the circadian pacemakers of P and NP rats differ mainly in light sensitivity, whereas those of HAD2 and LAD2 rats differ in their intrinsic period. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available