4.5 Article

Analysis of FOXP3 protein expression in human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells at the single-cell level

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 1681-1691

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200526189

Keywords

FOXP3; regulatory T cell; monoclonal antibody; lymphoma

Categories

Funding

  1. MRC [G84/6376] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G84/6376] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G84/6376] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transcription factor FOXP3 plays a key role in CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cell function and represents a specific marker for these cells. Despite its strong association with regulatory T cell function, in humans little is known about the frequency of CD4+CD25+ cells that express FOXP3 protein nor the distribution of these cells in vivo. Here we report the characterization of seven anti-FOXP3 monoclonal antibodies enabling the detection of endogenous human FOXP3 protein by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Flow-cytometric analysis showed that FOXP3 was expressed by the majority of CD4(+)CD25(high) T cells in peripheral blood. By contrast, less than half of the CD4(+)CD25(int) population were FOXP3(+), providing an explanation for observations in human T cells that regulatory activity is enriched within the CD4(+)CD25(high) pool. Although FOXP3 expression was primarily restricted to CD4(+)CD25(+) cells, it was induced following activation of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell clones. These findings indicate that the frequency of FOXP3(+) cells correlates with the level of expression of CD25 in naturally arising regulatory T cells and that FOXP3 protein is expressed by some activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell clones. These reagents represent valuable research tools to further investigate FOXP3 function and are applicable for routine clinical use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available