4.8 Article

Measurement of solution-phase chiral molecular recognition in the gas phase using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 77, Issue 11, Pages 3660-3670

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac050137d

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of chiral selectors (SOs) is important both for understanding chiral molecular recognition processes and for their use in the separation of chiral species (selectands). Their evaluation by chromatographic procedures (e.g., as chiral stationary phase) can, however, be time-consuming. In this respect, electrospray ionization-MS (ESI-MS) is tested here as a possible alternative for screening enantioselective binding by SOs. The set of well-characterized cinchona alkaloid SOs are investigated with respect to their enantioselective binding to a set of model enantiomers, dinitrobenzoyl-(R)- and dinitrobenzoyl-(S)-leucine. MS-based enantioselectivity values from normalized gas-phase ion abundances for the diastereomeric complexes are compared empirically to chromatographic (HPLC) enantioselectivity results and shown to be consistent. Investigations into the fundamentals of measuring unbiased enantioselectivity values in the limit of dilute solution by correlation between experimental and modeled theoretical data are shown. Titration experiments are used to extract binding constants and are compared with published calorimetric (ITC) data. Results show that while the magnitude of binding affinities determined for various diastereomeric complexes is attenuated, the relative ranking and stereochemical preference in binding are consistently reproduced. This work represents a fundamental study of solution- versus gas-phase correlation for enantioselective systems by ESI-MS and indicates that, although not all questions and assumptions can be clearly engaged, for these enthalpically driven binding systems, the relative degree of binding affinity and selectivity is preserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available