4.5 Article

Clustered root distribution in mature stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies

Journal

OECOLOGIA
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages 25-31

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0036-1

Keywords

Fagus sylvatica; Picea abies; root distribution; root cluster; space acquisition

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distribution of small roots (diameter between 2 mm and 5 mm) was studied in 19 pits with a total of 72 m(2) trench profile walls in pure stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies. Root positions within the walls were marked and transformed into x-coordinates and y-coordinates. In a GIS-based evaluation, zones of potential influence around each root were calculated. The total potential influence produced isoline maps of relative root influence zones, thus indicating small root clustering. The questions studied were (1) whether there were marked clusters of small roots in the soil and (2) whether trees surrounding the pit (defined as tree density) correlate with the root abundance and distribution on the trench profile walls. Small roots of both species showed maximum abundance in the top 20 cm of the soil, where pronounced root clusters occurred next to areas with only low root accumulation. The area of root clusters did not differ significantly between the two stands. Weighted clumping, WC, calculated as a product of root class, and its area was used as an index of root clustering, which again did not differ between beech and spruce stands. However, evaluations on a single root level showed that beech achieved the same degree of clustering with lower number of roots. Regardless of soil properties related to root clusters, a significantly higher clustering acquired per root for beech than for spruce suggests beech to be more efficient in belowground acquisition of space. Because none of the parameters describing root clustering were correlated with tree density around the investigated soil profiles, clusters of small roots are inherently present within the tree stands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available