4.8 Article

Electrocatalytic selective oxidation of glycerol to tartronate on Au/C anode catalysts in anion exchange membrane fuel cells with electricity cogeneration

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 360-368

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.02.040

Keywords

Selective oxidation; Glycerol; Gold nanoparticles; Fuel cell; Cogeneration

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [CBET-1159448]
  2. Michigan Tech REF grant [E49290]
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1159448] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable cogeneration of tartronate (high yield of 61.8%) and electrical energy (1527 J, 12 h) has been achieved from direct electrocatalytic oxidation of glycerol on Au/C in a 5 cm(2) anion exchange membranedirect glycerol fuel cells (AEM-DGFCs). The electrode structure and reaction conditions exhibited strong effects on the anode potential, which can be tuned to <0.45 V in favor of oxidizing two primary OH groups of glycerol while minimizing over-oxidation of the secondary OH and C C bond cleavage, thereby promoting the tartronate production. The relatively low activity of partial oxidation products (glycerate, tartronate, mesoxalate) on Au/C revealed in half cell indicates that the tartronate generation in AEMDGFCs is through direct adsorbed C-3 intermediates oxidation. Mass transport of reactants and reaction intermediates governed by the operational conditions was also found to play a critical role in regulating reaction rate and the desired products selectivity. Furthermore, Au/C prepared via aqueous phase reduction method (Au/C-AQ) was compared with organic phase nanocapsule method (Au/C-NC), and it shows the residual surfactants have little effect on the tartronate yield. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available