4.5 Article

Efficacy of new point-of-use water filter for preventing exposure to Legionella and waterborne bacteria

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages S20-S25

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.012

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Legionella species cause health care-acquired infections in which immunocompromised patients are disproportionately affected. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that point-of-use water fixtures are the reservoirs for these infections. The current approach to prevention is system-wide chemical disinfection of the hospital water system. These methods affect both low-risk and high-risk areas. A more effective approach to prevention may be a targeted approach aimed at protecting high-risk patients. One option is the application of a physical barrier (filter) at the point-of-use water fixture. Objectives: To evaluate the ability of point-of-use filters to eliminate Legionella and other pathogens from water. Methods: One hundred twenty-milliliter hot water samples were collected from 7 faucets (4 with filters and 3 without) immediately and after a 1-minute flush. Samples were collected every 2 or 3 days for 1 week. This cycle was repeated for 12 weeks. Samples were cultured for Legionella total heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria, and Mycobacterium species. Results: Five hundred ninety-four samples were collected over 12 cycles. No Legionella or Mycobacterium were isolated from the faucets with filters between T = 0 and T = 8 days. The mean concentration of L pneumophila and Mycobacterium from the control faucets was 104.5 CFU/mL and 0.44 CFU/mL, respectively. The filters achieved a greater than 99% reduction in HPC bacteria in the immediate and postflush samples. Conclusions: Point-of-use filters completely eliminated L pneumophila and Mycobacterium from hot water samples. These Filter units could prevent exposure of high-risk patients to waterborne pathogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available