4.8 Article

Effects of preparation method on the microstructure and photocatalytic performance of ZnSn(OH)6

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 532-542

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.11.039

Keywords

Zinc hydroxystannate; Photocatalysis; Preparation method; Microstructure

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21103060, 51172086, 51272081]
  2. open foundation of Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis - State Key Laboratory Breeding Base, Fuzhou University
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Anhui Provincial Education Committee [Kj2013A231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is indispensable to find a suitable preparation method to optimize the photocatalyst performance. Different ZnSn(OH)(6) (ZHS) were prepared by four methods in this report, including grinding, co-precipitation, self-templating, and hydrothermal processes. The crystal structures, optical properties, thermal stabilities, and morphologies of the ZHS samples were investigated systematically. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) and gaseous benzene (C6H6) over the samples were assessed and compared. The relationship between the microstructure and the photocatalytic performance of ZHS was analyzed. The results reveal the surface microstructure and the photocatalytic performance of ZHS are more sensitive to the preparation methods than the crystal structure and the morphology. A harsh preparation condition leads to the formation of some OH-unsaturated Zn and Sn atoms due to the susceptible of OH groups, which result in a tail light absorption of ZHS and are assumed as the photoactive center. ZHS prepared by the PVP-assisted hydrothermal method exhibits the highest thermal stability, optical absorption, BET surface area and ability for O-2 activation, and consequently shows the highest photocatalytic activity and stability for the degradation of MO and gaseous C6H6. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available