4.8 Article

Hydrothermally sulfonated single-walled carbon nanohorns for use as solid catalysts in biodiesel production by esterification of palmitic acid

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages 726-732

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.006

Keywords

Single-walled carbon nanohorns; Solid acid catalyst; Sulfonation; Esterification; Biodiesel

Funding

  1. JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Foreign Researchers FY
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [12F02074] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four carbon-based solid acid catalysts were prepared from single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNHs), oxidized SWCNHs (ox-SWCNHs), activated carbon (AC), and carbon black (CB) by hydrothermal sulfonation at 200 degrees C in an autoclave reactor. N-2 adsorption analysis suggested that sulfonation treatment leads to a drastic reduction in the number of relatively large pores with diameters greater than 20 nm in the SWCNHs and ox-SWCNHs. In addition, the BET surface area of the SWCNH was doubled by this sulfonation. These structural changes were not observed in AC and CB. The acid functional group formed on these solid catalysts by sulfonation was speculated to be -SO3H, and this was analyzed by ion-exchange titration. From the results, it was found that sulfonated SWCNHs (SO3H-SWCNHs) had the highest acid density of the four sulfonated specimens, which is a desirable property for its use as a biodiesel production catalyst. Methyl palmitate, a kind of biodiesel, was produced by the esterification of palmitic acid using these four catalysts. SO3H-SWCNHs produced the highest yield and the catalytic activity was significantly higher than that using a homogeneous sulfuric acid catalyst. Repeated esterification experiments suggested that the acid sites on SO3H-SWCNHs and SO3H-ox-SWCNHs were more stable than those on SO3H-AC and SO3H-CB. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available