4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Interaction between dietary lipids and physical inactivity on insulin sensitivity and on intramyocellular lipids in healthy men

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 1404-1409

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1404

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - To assess the effect of a possible interaction between dietary fat and physical inactivity on whole-body insulin sensitivity and intramyocellular lipids (IMCLs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Eight healthy male volunteers were studied on two occasions. After 2 days of an equilibrated diet and moderate physical activity, participants remained inactive (bed rest) for 60 h and consumed either a high-saturated fat (45% fat, of which similar to 60% was saturated fat [BR-HF]) or a high-carbohydrate (70% carbohydrate [BR-HCHO]) diet. To evaluate the effect of a high-fat diet alone, six Of the eight volunteers were restudied after a 2-day equilibrated diet followed by 60 h on a high-saturated fat diet and controlled physical activity (PA-HF). Insulin sensitivity was measured by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and IMCL concentrations by H-1-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS - Insulin-mediated glucose disposal was decreased by BR-HF condition (-24 +/- 6%, P < 0.05) but did not change with BR-HCHO (+ 19 +/- 10%, NS). BR-HF and BR-HCHO increased IMCL levels (+ 32 +/- 7%, P < 0.05 and + 17 +/- 8%, P < 0.0011, respectively). Although the increase in IMCL levels with PA-HF (+ 31 +/- 19%, P = 0.12) was similar to that during BR-HF, insulin-mediated glucose disposal (-7 +/- 9%, NS) was not decreased. CONCLUSIONS - These data indicate that physical inactivity and a high-saturated fat diet may interact to reduce whole-body insulin sensitivity. IMCL content was influenced by dietary lipid and physical inactivity but was not directly associated with insulin resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available