4.5 Article

Evidence for hepatocellular differentiation in alpha-fetoprotein-negative gastric adenocarcinoma with hepatoid morphology:: a study with in situ hybridisation for albumin mRNA

Journal

PATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 211-215

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1080/00313020500099221

Keywords

hepatoid adenocarcinoma; AFP-negative; ALB mRNA; in situ hybridisation; in situ hybridization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Hepatoid adenocarcinoma, a putative chemosensitive tumour, is defined as a tumour with aberrant hepatocellular differentiation occurring in extrahepatic organs such as the stomach, usually in the gastrointestinal tract. Differentiation in the hepatocellular direction is usually supported by the production of a-fetoprotein (AFP) and, more recently, albumin (ALB) mRNA. We investigated ALB mRNA to address whether adenocarcinoma with hepatoid morphology, regardless of AFP production, can be diagnosed solely by morphological criteria as a hepatoid adenocarcinoma. Methods: We performed in situ hybridisation (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IH) for ALB mRNA on AFP-negative gastric adenocarcinomas with hepatoid morphology. AFP-positive hepatoid adenocarcinomas and AFP-negative conventional gastric adenocarcinomas were also investigated as positive and negative controls, respectively. Results: All three gastric adenocarcinomas with hepatoid morphology with no evidence of AFP production stained positive for ALB mRNA, thus providing evidence of differentiation in the hepatocellular direction. Three of five cases of AFP-positive hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach were positive for ALB mRNA, while 11 cases of AFP-negative conventional gastric adenocarcinoma were negative. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that, irrespective of AFP production, gastric adenocarcinoma with morphological patterns suggestive of hepatoid differentiation should be diagnosed as hepatoid adenocarcinoma with important prognostic implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available