4.7 Article

Comparative actions of clomazone on β-carotene levels and growth in rice (Oryza sativa) and watergrasses (Echinochloa spp)

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 567-571

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.1007

Keywords

clomazone; rice watergrass; beta-carotene; growth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seedlings of rice, early watergrass (thiobencarb-resistant and thiobencarb-susceptible biotypes, R and S, respectively), and late watergrass (thiobencarb-resistant and thiobencarb-susceptible biotypes, R and S, respectively) were hydroponically exposed to clomazone at concentrations ranging from 0.08 to 7.9 mu m. Whole-plant growth (mg fresh wt) and beta-carotene concentrations (mu g g(-1) fresh wt) were measured after a 7-day exposure period. For growth, the no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) were 7.9, 0.21, 0.21, 0.46 and 0.46 mu m clomazone for rice, early watergrass (R), early watergrass (S), late watergrass (R) and late watergrass (S), respectively, while the concentrations causing 25% inhibition in response (IC25) were 5.6 (+/- 1.6), 0.46 (+/- 0.06), 0.42 (+/- 0.08), 0.92 (+/- 0.45) and 0.79 ( 0.08) gm clomazone, respectively. Clomazone inhibits beta-carotene synthesis via inhibition of the non-mevalonate isoprenoid synthetic pathway. For assessment of clomazone effects, beta-carotene levels proved to be a more sensitive toxicological endpoint than growth. For rice, early watergrass (R), early watergrass (S), late watergrass (R) and late watergrass (S), the beta-carotene NOECs were 0.21, < 0.08, < 0.08, 0.08 and 0.46 mu m clomazone respectively, while IC25 values were 0.42 (+/- 0.26), 0.08 (+/- 0.02), 0.08 (+/- 0.02), 0.33 (+/- 0.09) and 0.54 (+/- 0.15) gm, respectively. No evidence was found that the thiobencarb-resistance mechanisms present in early and late watergrasses impart resistance to clomazone. Due to similar sensitivity between rice and late watergrass, use of clomazone in rice culture will require the use of a safening technique. (c) 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available