4.8 Article

BRCA2 suppresses cell proliferation via stabilizing MAGE-D1

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 11, Pages 4747-4753

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0018

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1 R01 CA095221-01A1, R01 CA095221-04, R01 CA095221-02, R01 CA096986-04, R01 CA095221-05, R01 CA096986-05, R01 CA096986, R01 CA096986-02, R01 CA095221, 1 R01 CA96986-01A1, R01 CA096986-03, R01 CA095221-03, R01 CA095221-01A1, R01 CA096986-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Germ line mutations in BRCA2 gene predispose women to early-onset familial breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA2 is a protein of multiple functions. In addition to its role in DNA double-strand break repair, BRCA2 also plays a role in stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks, cytokinesis, transcription regulation, mammalian gametogenesis, centrosome duplication, and suppression of cell proliferation. However, how BRCA2 mutations predispose women specifically to breast and ovarian cancer remains undefined. Here we found that BRCA2 binds and stabilizes MAGE-D1, a member of the MAGE gene family of proteins. Expression of BRCA2 and MAGE-D1 synergistically suppresses cell proliferation independently of the p53 pathway. Using two MAGE-D1 RNA interferences and two cell lines expressing low or undetectable levels of MAGE-D1, we further showed that the expression of MAGE-D1 is required for BRCA2-mediated suppression of cell proliferation, indicating that MAGE-D1 is a downstream target of BRCA2 and that BRCA2 suppresses cell proliferation via stabilizing MAGE-D1. Importantly, MAGE-D1 protein expression was reduced in 6 of 16 breast carcinoma cell lines tested as compared with untransformed immortal mammary epithelial cell lines, suggesting that suppression of MAGE-D1 expression may be involved in the tumorigenesis of a subset of sporadic breast cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available