4.8 Article

Rationale for antiangiogenic cancer therapy with vaccination using epitope peptides derived from human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 11, Pages 4939-4946

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3759

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Angiogenesis is a critical mechanism for tumor progression. Multiple studies have suggested that tumor growth can be suppressed if tumor angiogenesis can be inhibited using various types of antiangiogenic agents. Recent studies in mouse systems have shown that tumor angiogenesis can also be inhibited if cellular immune response could be induced against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), which is one of the key factors in tumor angiogenesis. In this study, we examined the possibility of developing this novel immunotherapy in clinical setting. We first identified the epitope peptides of VEGFR2 and showed that stimulation using these peptides induces CTLs with potent cytotoxicity in the HLA class I-restricted fashion against not only peptide-pulsed target cells but also endothelial cells endogenously expressing VEGFR2. In A2/Kb transgenic mice that express alpha 1 and alpha 2 domains of human HLA-A*0201, vaccination using these epitope peptides in vivo was associated with significant suppression of the tumor growth and prolongation of the animal survival without fatal adverse effects. In antiangiogenesis assay, tumor-induced angiogenesis was significantly suppressed with the vaccination using these epitope peptides. Furthermore, CTLs specific to the epitope peptides were successfully induced in cancer patients, and the specificities of the CTLs were confirmed using functional and HLA-tetramer analysis. These results in vitro and in vivo strongly suggest that the epitope peptides derived from VEGFR2 could be used as the agents for antiangiogenic immunotherapy against cancer in clinical settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available