4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages 1745-1752

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.039

Keywords

stress; psychology; psychosocial; reproduction; marital; gender; counselling; infertility; in vitro fertilization; fertility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the separate and joint effects of male and female fertility problem (FP) stress and the source of stress (e.g., personal, social, marital) on treatment outcome. Design: Prospective, epidemiological cohort design. Setting: Fertility clinics in Denmark. Patient(s): Eight hundred eighteen couples who were about to begin a new course of treatment. Intervention(S): An FP stress inventory was administered at the start of treatment, and the treatment outcome was evaluated 12 months later. Main Outcome Measure(S): Number of treatment cycles in 12-month study period and treatment outcome (i.e., success. no success). Result(S): Fertility problem stress was associated with a poorer treatment outcome in women (pooled within-Groups [WGr] correlation,WGr =.517) and men (WGr =.392) with the effect significantly more pronounced for women (z = 3.19, P <.001). Fertility problem stress arising in the personal and marital domain showed greater associations with treatment outcome than did FP stress from the social domain. Logistic regression indicated that women who reported more marital distress required more treatment cycles to conceive (median 3) than women reporting less marital distress (median 2) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20: Model X-2 (3) = 77.21, P <.001). Conclusion(S): The findings provide evidence that infertility-related stress has direct and indirect effects on treatment outcome. (c) 2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available