4.7 Article

The obese insulin-sensitive adolescent: Importance of adiponectin and lipid partitioning

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 3731-3737

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-2305

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR-06022, M01 RR-00125] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD-40787, R01-HD 28016, K24 HD-01464] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK-068229] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a wide interindividual variation in peripheral insulin sensitivity at any given body mass index or percent body fat among obese adolescents with normal glucose tolerance. The goals of this study were to determine whether variability in insulin sensitivity is associated with differences in patterns of lipid partitioning or substrate use under fasting and hyperinsulinemic conditions. We compared 14 obese insulin-resistant adolescents with 14 obese insulin-sensitive controls, pair matched for age, gender, pubertal stage and body composition. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, intramyocellular lipid content by H-1-nuclear magnetic resonance and visceral fat by magnetic resonance imaging. Obese insulin-sensitive subjects had lower intramyocellular (1.64 +/- 0.68 vs. 2.26 +/- 0.62% of water peak, P = 0.017) and visceral lipid deposition ( 45 +/- 23 vs. 77 +/- 52 cm(2), P = 0.04) and a higher level of adiponectin, compared with their obese-resistant counterparts (8.8 +/- 3.6 vs. 6.5 +/- 1.8 mu g/dl, P = 0.015). Glycerol fluxes were similar between the two obese groups yet occurred in the face of different concentrations of insulin. Intramyocellular lipid and visceral fat were negatively related to insulin sensitivity. Obese insulin-sensitive adolescents are characterized by lower lipid deposition in the intramyocellular and visceral compartments and greater levels of adiponectin, despite similar degree of adiposity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available