4.8 Article

Efficient low-temperature catalytic combustion of trichloroethylene over flower-like mesoporous Mn-doped CeO2 microspheres

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 102, Issue 3-4, Pages 475-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.029

Keywords

Flower-like mesoporous microsphere; Mn-doped CeO2; Hydrothermal synthesis; Trichloroethylene; Catalytic combustion

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB732300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20673037]
  3. Commission of Science and Technology of Shanghai Municipality [06JC14095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flower-like mesoporous Mn-doped CeO2 microspheres with three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical structures were successfully prepared by a hydrothermal method with the aid of glucose and acrylic acid and subsequent particular thermal treatment, and characterized by SEM, XRD, N-2 adsorption/desorption, H-2-TPR, XPS, Raman spectra and so on. The results show that the atomic ratios of Mn/(Ce + Mn) in the Ce-Mn-O samples as well as their morphologies affect obviously their catalytic performances for low-temperature catalytic combustion of trichloroethylene (TCE). These flower-like Ce-Mn-O microspheres have not only very excellent activity but also high stability, compared with pure flower-like CeO2 microspheres or bulk Ce-Mn-O samples. The flower-like sample with atomic ratio of Mn/(Ce + Mn) of 0.21 exhibits the best activity, for instance, T-50 (the temperature for 50% conversion of ICE) is as low as 87 degrees C, showing much higher catalytic activity than the sample prepared by a co-precipitation or sol-gel method. High surface area, high oxygen mobility and rich surface active oxygen species are responsible for the high catalytic performance of flower-like Mn-doped CeO2 microspheres, compared with general Ce-Mn-O mixed oxides. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available