4.8 Article

Ag/MCM-41 as a highly efficient mesostructured catalyst for the chemoselective synthesis of methyl glycolate and ethylene glycol

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 108, Issue 1-2, Pages 90-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.08.013

Keywords

Ag/MCM-41; Dimethyl oxalate; Ethylene glycol; Methyl glycolate; Hydrogenation

Funding

  1. Major State Basic Resource Development Program [2003CB 615807]
  2. NNSFC [21173052, 20973042]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20090071110011]
  4. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08DZ2270500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel highly efficient heterogeneous Ag/MCM-41 catalyst was prepared by ammonia-evaporation deposition-precipitation method and displayed outstanding methyl glycolate (MG) selectivity (up to 99%) and ethylene glycol (EG) selectivity (up to 99%) in the chemoselective gas-phase hydrogenation of dimethyloxalate (DMO). Systematic characterizations have been carried out to elucidate the bulk and surface physicochemical properties of the catalysts. It is shown that the silver loading, the calcination temperature, the surface hydroxyl group amount and the pretreatment atmosphere all have great influences on the catalytic performance of DMO hydrogenation reaction. The best catalytic performance could be achieved over the Ag/MCM-41 catalyst with 10 wt.% silver loading after calcined at 673 K. Much higher catalytic activity could be obtained via the MCM-41 supported silver catalyst with large amount of surface hydroxyl groups. The argon pretreated Ag/MCM-41 catalyst with less subsurface oxygen species exhibited much higher DMO conversion and MG selectivity compared with H-2 and air pretreated samples. Under the optimized reaction conditions, 99% yield of MG and EG could be obtained over the optimized Ag/MCM-41 catalyst. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available