4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Organ distribution and bioaccumulation of microcystins in freshwater fish at different trophic levels from the eutrophic Lake Chaohu, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 293-300

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tox.20120

Keywords

microcystin; fish; bioaccumulation; organ distribution; food chain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports the organ distribution and bioaccumulation of hepatotoxic microcystins (MCs) in freshwater fishes at different trophic levels from the large, shallow, eutrophic Lake Chaohu in September 2003, when there were heavy surface blooms of toxic cyanobacteria. Among all fish, intestines and blood had the highest average content of MC-RR + MC-LR (22.0 and 14.5 mu g g(-1) DW, respectively), followed by liver, bile, and kidney (7.77, 6.32, and 5.81 mu g g(-1) DW, respectively), whereas muscle had the least (1.81 mu g g(-1) DW). MC content in muscle was highest in carnivorous fish (Culter ilishaeformis, 2.22 mu g g(-1) DW) and omnivorous fish (Carassius auratus, 1.96 mu g g(-1) DW) and was lowest in phytoplanktivorous fish (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, 1.65 mu g g(-1) DW) and herbivorous fish (Parabramis pekinensis 0.660 mu g g(-1) DW). However, the amount of MC in the gut of H. molitrix (137 mu g g(-1) DW) was more than 20 times that in the other fish (< 6.50 mu g g(-1) DW). The MCs showed a tendency to accumulate up the food chain, and piscivorous fish at the top of the food chain were at high risk of exposure to MCs in Lake Chaohu. Our study is the first to report MC concentrations in the bile and blood of wild fish. One hundred grams of fish muscle would contain 2.64-49.7 mu g of MC-LR equivalent, or about 1.3-25 times the recommended tolerable daily intake of MC-LR by humans, indicating that fish are already severely contaminated by MCs and that the local authorities should warn the public of the risk of poisoning by eating the contaminated fish. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available