4.8 Article

Preferential oxidation of CO over Pt-Sn/AC catalyst: Adsorption, performance and DRIFTS studies

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 106, Issue 3-4, Pages 540-549

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.06.014

Keywords

Preferential CO oxidation; DRIFTS; PROX; Hydrogen purification; Activated carbon

Funding

  1. Scientific-Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [105M282]
  2. State Planning Organization (DPT) [DPT03K120250, DPT07K120630]
  3. TUBA (Turkish Academy of Sciences)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preferential CO oxidation over 1% Pt-0.25% Sn supported on nitric acid treated activated carbon (AC-N) was studied for various feed compositions including fully realistic feed. The real time performance of the catalyst and the effect of reaction parameters on its PROX activity and selectivity were investigated. Factors leading to high performance of the Pt-Sn/AC-N catalyst were scrutinized by CO and O(2) adsorption and PROX tests conducted on an in situ diffuse reflectance IR Fourier transform spectroscopy system connected to a mass spectrometer (FTIR-DRIFTS-MS). CO and CO(2) adsorption properties of Pt-Sn/AC-N and Pt/AC-N samples were also studied by a gravimetric analyzer. FTIR-DRIFTS-MS and adsorption studies confirmed enhanced CO chemisorption on Pt-Sn/AC-N catalyst compared to that on Pt/AC-N. The performance results showed that the presence of CO(2) and H(2)O in the feed does not significantly affect the CO conversion performance and CO selectivity of the catalyst. In all tests, CO conversion increased with the decrease in temperature within 135-110 degrees C range, indicating enhancement in CO selectivity as the temperature decreases. The CO conversion of the catalyst reached for the W/F value tested was ca. 90% at 110 degrees C for the H(2)-rich feed including CO(2), water vapor and methane. (C) 2011 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available