4.1 Article

Nanog expression in mouse germ cell development

Journal

GENE EXPRESSION PATTERNS
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 639-646

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.modgep.2005.03.001

Keywords

Nanog; reprogramming; PGC7; stella; TRA98; SCP3; PGC; genital ridge; gonad; testis; ovary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanog is a newly identified transcriptional factor bearing a homeodomain and expressed in pluripotential cells of preimplantation and early postimplantation embryos, and embryonic stem (ES) and embryonic germ (EG) cells. Knockout experiments indicate that Nanog functions as a key player in maintaining the pluripotency of stem cells. Importantly, Nanog expression is highly expressed in primordial germ cells (PGCs) of E11.5 and E12.5 mouse embryos. However, its temporal and spatial expression pattern and function in germ cells are largely unknown. To address these issues, whole embryos and cryosections of embryos were immumostained with anti-NANOG and anti-STELLA/PGC7 antibodies. NANOG expression, repressed in colonized PGCs of E7.25-E7.5 embryos, became detectable in migrating PGCs of E7.75-E8.0 embryos. Both male and female PGCs migrating in E9.5 and E10.5 embryos and colonizing the genital ridges of El 1.5 and E12.5 embryos were positive for NANOG immumostaining, while the NANOG expression pattern differed between the sexes in the later developmental stage. In female gonadal PGCs of E13.5 and E14.5 embryos, NANOG became undetectable in germ cells positive for the synaptonemal complex-specific protein SCP3, while in male PGCs of E14.5-E16.5 embryos, the number of NANOG-positive germ cells drastically decreased during the mitotic arrest. No germ cells positive for NANOG were detectable in testes and ovaries of adult mice. Thus, in germ cell development, NANOG is expressed in proliferating germ cells, in which nuclear reprogramming is progressing. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available