4.7 Article

Cyclization of Rouse chains at long- and short-time scales

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 122, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.1924412

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have investigated cyclization of a Rouse chain at long and short times by a Langevin dynamics simulation method. We measure S(t), the fraction of nonreacted chains, for polymerizations ranging from Z=5 to Z=800 and capture distances ranging from a=0.1b to a=8b where b is the bond length. Comparison is made with two theoretical approaches. The first is a decoupling approximation used by Wilemski and Fixman to close the relevant master equation [J. Chem. Phys. 58, 4009 (1973); 60, 866 (1974)]. The second approach is the renormalization group arguments of Friedman and O'Shaughnessy [Phys. Rev. Lett 60, 64 (1988); J. Phys. II 1, 471 (1991)]. We find that at long times S(t) decays as a single exponential with rate k(infinity). The scaled decay rate K=k(infinity)tau(R) appears to approach a constant value independent of the capture distance for very large chains consistent with the predictions of both the renormalization group (RG) and Wilemski-Fixman closure approximation. We extract K-*, the long chain limit of K, from the fixed point a=a(*) where K is independent of Z. K-* is larger than both the RG and closure predictions but much closer to the RG result. More convincing evidence for the RG analysis is obtained by comparing the short-time decay of S(t) to long-time results. The RG analysis predicts that dS/dt should decay as a power law at early times and that the exponent in the power law is related to K by a simple expression with no free parameters. Our simulations find remarkable agreement with this parameter-free prediction even for relatively short chains. We discuss possible experimental consequences of our result. (c) 2005 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available