4.8 Article

Conversion of cellulose to hydrocarbon fuels by progressive removal of oxygen

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 100, Issue 1-2, Pages 184-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.029

Keywords

Biomass; Cellulose; gamma-Valerolactone; Heterogeneous catalysis; Hydrocarbon fuels

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [832760] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a catalytic process to convert cellulose into liquid hydrocarbon fuels (diesel and gasoline), using a cascade strategy to achieve the progressive removal of oxygen from biomass, allowing the control of reactivity and facilitating the separation of products. The process starts with the deconstruction of solid cellulose in an aqueous solution of sulfuric acid yielding an equi-molar mixture of levulinic acid and formic acid. The formic acid in this mixture can then be used (upon decomposition to H-2 and CO2) to reduce levulinic acid to gamma-valerolactone (GVL) in the sulfuric acid solution over a Ru/C catalyst. The formation of GVL allows strategies for the separation and recycling of the sulfuric acid used in the cellulose deconstruction step. This GVL product, with residual amounts of sulfur, can be upgraded to 5-nonanone with high yields (90%) in a single reactor by using a dual catalyst bed of Pd/Nb2O5 plus ceria-zirconia. The 5-nonanone product is hydrophobic and separates spontaneously from water, yet possesses a functional group that can be used to control the structure and molecular weight of hydrocarbon fuel components formed in downstream catalytic upgrading treatments. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available